Se rendre au contenu

Greening procurement

The strategic path to decarbonized and resilient healthcare
13 janvier 2026 par
Greening procurement
Maarten Van Laere

When we think of a hospital’s environmental footprint, we often picture smoking chimneys or idling ambulances. Yet, the data tells a different story: the most significant impact is hidden in the boxes and packages opened by healthcare staff every day. Globally, supply-chain emissions, also called Scope 3, account for 50–75% of healthcare’s total carbon footprint. Even excluding pharmaceuticals, the everyday essentials such as disposables, IT hardware, and medical equipment contribute over a third of an hospital’s total climate impact. In other words: the goods we rely on to heal patients are, ironically, contributing to the planetary health crisis.


emissions per domain in a 700-bed hospital in Belgium. This pie chart illustrates that the majority of emissions stem from medical goods (31%) and pharmaceuticals (29%, 10,390t). The remaining domains include transport (14%, 4,997t), food (10%, 3,480t), energy (9%, 2,991t), construction (4%, 1,251t), waste (2%, 720t), laundry (1%, 389t), and cooling and water (0% each, 67t and 16t respectively).

Figure 1: Share of CO2-emissions per domain, in a 700-bed hospital in Belgium

Furthermore, the issue with these goods is not just about "going green". The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of our global supply chains, leaving frontline staff without essential PPE. By shifting toward sustainable procurement and strategic autonomy, hospitals aren't just cutting carbon emissions, they’re ensuring that the right tools are always available for the right patient, regardless of global geopolitical shifts.

At the same time, the regulatory horizon is evolving. While the immediate reporting mandates of the CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive) may focus primarily on listed entities, the broader momentum of the European Green Deal remains undeniable. Whether through direct regulation or indirect market pressure, transparency is becoming the norm. This moves sustainability from a "nice-to-have" to a fundamental pillar of future-proof hospital management.

Shifting to circular economy

Today’s healthcare operates on a "linear" model: we extract resources, manufacture products, use them once, and discard them as waste. This "take-make-waste" approach is the primary driver of the sector's massive Scope 3 footprint. To achieve decarbonization, optimise resource-use and increase resilience, hospitals must transition to a circular economy, aiming to decouple high-quality patient care from constant resource consumption. This means treating medical goods as valuable assets to be kept in circulation, rather than disposable consumables.

Practically, this switch is guided by the R-strategies, a framework for circular economy, prioritizing prevention of waste over disposal. The journey begins with Refuse, Rethink and Reduce. The most effective way to move to a circular economy, is to challenge the necessity of an item before it is even purchased. This involves "stripping back" surgical kits to their essentials and questioning habits that lead to unnecessary waste. By Reducing the volume of items opened "just in case," hospitals achieve immediate "Lean and Green" wins.

Alt Text: R-Strategies Hierarchy An infographic titled R-STRATEGIES illustrating a hierarchy of ten circular economy strategies, ranging from R0 (Refuse) at the top for highest circularity to R9 (Recover) at the bottom for lowest circularity.  The strategies are categorized into three levels of efficiency:  Smarter Product Manufacturing and Use: R0 Refuse, R1 Rethink, and R2 Reduce.  Extended Lifespan of Product and Parts: R3 Reuse, R4 Repair, R5 Refurbish, R6 Remanufacture, and R7 Repurpose.  Useful Application of Materials: R8 Recycle and R9 Recover.  A vertical arrow indicates that circularity increases as the focus shifts from material recovery toward smarter product design and manufacturing.

Figure 2: R-strategies (Circular Flanders, 2025)

When a product is clinically necessary, the focus shifts to high-value Reuse. This strategy replaces the "throwaway" culture with durable alternatives, such as textile drapes or stainless-steel instruments, designed to withstand hundreds of cycles of reuse. For complex technology where traditional reuse is not yet feasible, Remanufacturing (Refurbish/Repair) offers another path. Rather than following a cycle of premature replacement, we must treat high-value equipment, from patient monitors to diagnostic imaging systems, as enduring assets that can be upgraded and restored to peak performance. This strategic life-extension ensures that the embedded carbon and critical raw materials remain within the healthcare system, avoiding the heavy environmental and financial toll of unnecessary decommissioning and incineration.

Further along the spectrum sit Recycle and Recover. While recycling is often the first thing people think of when discussing "going green"; it is a very ineffective circular strategy. Recycling is energy-intensive and often results in "downcycling," where high-quality medical grade polymers are turned into lower-grade products like park benches or shipping pallets, eventually leaving the loop anyway. Furthermore, contaminated clinical waste often cannot be recycled at all, leaving energy Recovery (incineration) as the final, least desirable option. While recovering energy from waste is better than landfilling, it still represents a loss of the raw materials and the high carbon investment that went into manufacturing.

By understanding that recycling is a "failure of circularity" rather than the goal, hospitals can refocus their efforts where they matter most: at the earliest stage, where waste is prevented before it is even created. By systematically applying these R-strategies, procurement teams move away from end-of-pipe solutions toward a model that preserves value and builds a truly resilient, low-carbon supply chain. This holistic approach ensures high-quality care is delivered sustainably without exhausting natural and social capital.


Three areas of intervention

​1. Systems

Procurement
Without reliable data, it is difficult to identify spillage or to measure impact. When hospitals want to reduce their environmental footprint, the first step is gaining visibility into what they buy. Procurement data is often fragmented: one site records gloves “per box,” another “per piece,” making it impossible to compare or track usage. Data transparency can be improved by harmonizing systems and integrating environmental indicators. Modern ERP tools now allow hospitals to embed metrics such as CO₂ footprint, recyclability, or packaging waste alongside cost.

Hospitals need clear procurement criteria to turn sustainability goals into daily practice. A practical step is creating sustainability-weighted checklists by product group, evaluating materials, transport, durability, and packaging waste. The Flemish government, in collaboration with the Dutch Rijksoverheid, provides the MVOO tool to offer procurement teams a localized database of social and environmental criteria for their tenders. Integrating these evidence-based requirements ensures that every purchase aligns with circularity goals while protecting both our natural and social capital.

To avoid "analysis paralysis", procurement teams can use Circular Flanders “goals and strategies for circular procurement” to decide where to focus: is the priority reducing raw material input or extending life through repair? By implementing "life cycle thinking", hospitals consider the total impact from production to disposal, rather than just investment costs. Importantly, these criteria should not remain theoretical; they must be systematically applied in tender processes. By moving toward functional descriptions, where the result is described rather than just the product, suppliers are allowed to propose more circular, innovative solutions that administrators might not have even considered.

An infographic titled GOALS AND STRATEGIES FOR CIRCULAR PURCHASERS by Circular Flanders. It presents five color-coded categories of circular strategies:  Category A (Red) – Reduce total amount of materials: Strategies include internal sharing, renting, and minimal use of materials in design.  Category B (Yellow) – Reduce amount of virgin inputs: Strategies focus on increasing the use of recycled and biobased content.  Category C (Green) – Extend the useful life: Strategies include extending guarantees, contractual repair arrangements, and designing for longevity.  Category D (Blue) – Maximise the reusability of a product or component: Strategies focus on design for disassembly, modular design, and take-back arrangements.  Category E (Purple) – Maximise the reusability or recyclability of materials: Strategies include design for recycling, reducing toxicity, and using biologically degradable materials.
Figure 3: Goals and strategies for circular purchasers (Circular Flanders, 2025)

Hospitals, especially large networks, hold significant leverage over suppliers. By consistently including sustainability requirements in tenders, they encourage manufacturers to improve their products and practices. A critical way to exercise this leverage is through a Market Dialogue. Rather than simply signaling demand, effective dialogue is a collaborative, two-way process; by engaging suppliers early, hospitals can listen to market capabilities and co-develop innovations that are both ambitious and realistic.

This alignment ensures that sustainability expectations are credible and attainable. While requesting formal Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) demonstrates high ambition, positioning them as an aspirational benchmark or phased expectation (rather than a strict barrier) prevents the exclusion of smaller, innovative players. By asking targeted questions about durability and repairability, hospitals can still act as "launching customers", shifting the wider market toward long-term sustainability and resilience.

Procurement criteria only work if staff have the right skills. Many buyers excel at price negotiation but lack training in sustainability metrics or Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). Initiatives like the NHS’s Green Champions Hub and the EU’s Public Procurement of Innovation program show how carbon literacy and structured training enable greener purchasing decisions.


"Circular procurement acts as a driver for innovation, a lever for reputation, and an anchor for resilience: essential today, defining tomorrow."

Alexandra Vandevyvere
Circular Economy Facilitator - Circular Flanders

Logistics

Transitioning from a "buy-use-discard" model to a circular one requires a fundamental shift in hospital logistics. On the incoming side, hospitals must rethink inventory management; reusables often require more storage for circulating stock compared to the "just-in-time" delivery of disposables. However, the most significant change lies in organizing Reverse Logistics. In a linear system, logistics ends at the ward's trash bin. In a circular system, "return loops" are essential, moving used goods back from the ward to a central point for reprocessing.

Implementing this requires a designed-in recovery system: clearer bedside sorting, dedicated transport loops, and a logistics team that treats "used" goods as valuable assets rather than waste. By closing these internal loops, feeding items back to the Central Sterile Services Department (CSSD) or external partners, hospitals reduce reliance on volatile global markets. This transforms a waste stream into a reliable, internal supply of tools, strengthening both environmental and operational resilience.

​2. Medical goods

Medical goods are the most visible intersection of sustainability and patient care. By rethinking procurement and usage, hospitals can achieve major environmental and financial gains without compromising safety nor quality.

Surgical sets offer immense potential. A UK study on carpal tunnel release (Kodumuri, 2023) compared conventional methods with a streamlined "lean and green" approach. The standard operation produced 28.8 kg CO₂e, while the lean method, using essential instruments and fewer disposables; reduced the footprint by 80% (to 6.6 kg), cut waste by 65%, and lowered costs by 66%. Crucially, it saved 20 minutes per procedure, enabling two extra operations per day. Similar results are seen in cataract surgery, hernia repairs and dermatology, where lean kits deliver the same outcomes with less waste and emissions.

Two stacked bar charts comparing a standard carpal release procedure to the "Lean and Green" method (Kodumuri, 2023).$CO_{2}$ Emission (kg): The standard method generates approximately 28.5 kg of $CO_{2}$, whereas the "Lean and Green" method reduces this to roughly 6.5 kg. The reduction is most significant in the "Instruments" and "Drapes" categories.Cost Analysis (€): The standard method costs approximately €60 per procedure, while the "Lean and Green" method costs only €21.Both charts break down impacts into four categories: Instruments (blue), Drapes (orange), Consumables (grey), and Resterilisation (yellow), demonstrating that "Lean and Green" practices simultaneously achieve massive carbon savings and significant cost reductions.

Figure 3: Comparison of CO2 emissions and procedural costs between standard and "lean and green" carpal release method (Kodumuri, 2023)

PPE and textiles are another hotspot. LCAs show that reusable gowns and drapes emit two-thirds fewer greenhouse gases than disposables. While many assume sterilization is water-intensive, most of the water consumption occurs during the production of raw fibers for single-use items. Switching to reusables eliminates this hidden footprint; UCLA Health Hospitals in the US, for example, saved $1.1 million annually and diverted 300 tons of waste by making the switch. Nordic health systems already publish guidance on reusable OR textiles, and the NHS is piloting their use at scale. 

Furthermore, high-value technical equipment deserves scrutiny. For complex technology, refurbishment and professional repair offer a vital path. Under strict frameworks like EU MDR Article 17, devices can be professionally restored to peak performance, ensuring embedded carbon and raw materials are preserved within the healthcare system rather than lost to incineration, if Member States allow it and conditions are met. LCAs confirm that remanufacturing substantially lowers emissions while maintaining safety.

Hospitals must address the pervasive "just-in-case" culture that leads to significant clinical waste. A study on hand surgery revealed that an average of 11 items are wasted per case, totaling over totaling 441 kg CO₂e and over $2,000 in costs across 85 cases. Surgeons estimate that 26% of opened sterile single-use items go unused, yet most are eager to reduce this inefficiency. In the US alone, hospitals waste $15 million annually in unopened OR supplies that could be safely redirected. Adopting lean sets, stocking only essentials, and empowering staff through education are the next critical steps in eliminating this spillage.

​3. Non-medical goods

While medical products often draw the most focus, non-medical goods contribute significantly to a hospital’s footprint. Digital transformation offers immediate gains; for instance, the NHS App’s wayfinding feature allows patients to manage referrals digitally, cutting emissions by 97.8% per letter and avoiding 30 million printed sheets, saving 6,600 tonnes of CO₂e. Transitioning to QR codes and digital forms ensures both staff and patients access real-time information without the waste of physical brochures.

Cleaning practices offer further opportunities for impact. UV-C disinfection reduces reliance on chemical cleaners, while probiotic cleaning shows potential to lower both costs and hospital-acquired infection rates. Food and beverage services are another high-impact area. By sourcing local produce, implementing plant-forward menus, and re-serving unopened, portion-controlled meals, hospitals can reduce waste while directly improving patient nutrition.

Lastly, ICT devices and e-waste require urgent attention. The WHO reports that electronic waste is the world’s fastest-growing waste stream, yet only 22% is recycled globally. By extending device lifespans and collaborating with certified recyclers, an approach supported by the EU Circular Electronics Initiative, hospitals can recoup value from hardware while significantly reducing environmental harm.

Driving change

Lasting sustainability in healthcare hinges on the people and processes inside the hospital walls. For many healthcare staff, "Net Zero" can feel like a distant administrative goal, but in practice, every decision on the ground matters. Clinical staff are the "eyes on the ground." International experience shows that when staff are empowered, small, bottom-up innovations drive systemic impact:

  • Surgeons identify instruments in standard sets that are opened but never used.
  • Nurses adjust how many packs are opened during procedures and ensure correct bedside waste sorting.
  • Pharmacists pinpoint where overprescribing leads to avoidable waste and expiry risks.
  • Logistics assistants can prevent overstocking through “first-in, first-out” inventory management.
  • Administrative staff can reduce paper by moving to digital patient information or by using email and patient portals instead of printed letters.

Procurement cannot be left to administrators alone. When procurement officers and clinical teams collaborate, they align contracts with actual clinical needs rather than theoretical estimates. Hospitals that close the gap between the office and the ward will make the fastest progress. 

In a bright hospital hallway, a female healthcare worker in blue scrubs and gloves points to a clear IV bag while talking to a man in a grey polo shirt holding a tablet. They stand next to a medical cart topped with various supplies.

While staff insights spark the transition, true circularity is impossible without a robust Central Sterile Services Department (CSSD). Every reusable surgical instrument, gown, and container must pass through high-standard sterilization before it can safely return to the ward. A well-organized CSSD makes reuse both reliable and traceable, transforming small, bottom-up innovations into scalable, hospital-wide practices.

By enabling safe and efficient reprocessing, the CSSD acts as the engine of decarbonization, cutting emissions and lowering costs without compromising clinical safety. To realize this potential, hospitals must treat the CSSD as a strategic asset rather than a back-office utility. This means investing in capacity, leveraging automation and robotics, and including CSSD expertise in all procurement planning from the very beginning. In a sustainable hospital, the CSSD is the infrastructure that makes green efforts possible.

A wide, clean hospital CSSD kitchen featuring stainless steel appliances and counters. The room has a bright blue floor and white walls, with large square light panels on the ceiling. A long prep island with sinks and stovetops runs down the center, . Windows look out onto a parking area on the right.

A resilient future

By greening procurement and entering a circular economic model, hospitals ensure that they can provide safe, affordable care within planetary boundaries, independent of fragile global supply chains. By aligning systems, goods, and people, hospitals protect both their patients and their resources. However, moving from a shared vision to tangible results requires a shift in daily operations. To bridge the gap between high-level sustainability goals and the reality of the ward, leadership must focus on three decisive areas:

  1. Move beyond upfront purchase prices. Evaluate goods based on their full lifecycle, accounting for waste disposal costs and supply chain reliability.
  2. Administrative logic must meet bedside reality. By empowering Green Teams and tapping into clinical expertise, leadership can identify "lean and green" opportunities to eliminate waste before it ever reaches the hospital floor.
  3. Strengthening sterilization capacity and automation is the most effective way to scale reusables and break the cycle of high-carbon, single-use dependency.

At NZHI, we help hospitals make medical goods more sustainable without compromising safety or quality. From reducing the footprint of surgical kits and PPE to integrating reuse through your CSSD, we support hospitals at every stage of the transition. With science-based tools and hands-on expertise, we ensure that your efforts deliver real impact. Let us help you move from intent to impact.

We thank Alexandra Vandevyvere (Circular Flanders) for her expert review and valuable contribution to this article.

References

  1. Building Better Care, 2022, NHS App reduces carbon emissions
  2. International Hospital Federation, 2024, Sustainable procurement in hospitals
  3. Kodumuri et al., 2023, Reducing the carbon footprint in carpal tunnel surgery inside the operating room with a lean and green model: a comperative study
  4. Mölnlycke Health Care, 2024, Sustainable procurement in the health care sector 
  5. Circular Flanders, 2025, Circulair aankopen, Focus op waardebehoud
  6. UNDP, 2020, Sustainable  Health Procurement Guidance Note
Greening procurement
Maarten Van Laere 13 janvier 2026
Partager cet article
Archive